Why a $5,000 Watch is More Than Just a Timepiece

One GQ editor learned how valuable his watch was when it was stolen.

watch
(Flickr)

In 2007, GQ editor Ross McCammon bought himself a really nice watch. It was a Mark XVI pilot’s watch by Swiss watchmaker IWC, and it cost him about $5,000, which he writes was a significant portion of his life savings at the time. He says that it was a “perfect object” because it isn’t gaudy, it is easy to use, and it is “straight-up beautiful.” But then, in 2012, the watch was stolen by one of four men employed by a moving company that McCammon and his wife hired when they relocated from downtown Manhattan to Brooklyn. The moving-company owner denied that his employees stole anything, and since the watch wasn’t insured, he couldn’t get any money for a replacement. Since he had a six-month-old son at the time, McCammon did not want to spend the money on a new one. But McCammon says he thinks about the watch all the time. He says that the watch is a brilliant feat of engineering and an understated piece of jewelry, but he mourns the loss of it so much because it was also the ideal heirloom: “valuable, useful, transferable, and (in a pinch) hidable.” McCammon says he often thinks about the scene in Pulp Fiction, where Captain Koons (Christopher Walken) tells a young boy about the odyssey of a gold wristwatch that the boy’s great-grandfather bought during World War I: “I hid this uncomfortable hunk of metal up my ass—two years,” Koons says. “And now, little man, I give the watch to you.” McCammon calls the scene funny, weird and jarring, but most importantly, moving. He bought a watch he couldn’t afford to give it away, and that was stolen from him.

Meet your guide

The InsideHook Newsletter.

News, advice and insights for the most interesting person in the room.