This Might Be the World's Grimmest Tiny House

A shipping container is better than a cave, but not by much

By Diane Rommel

 
This Might Be the World's Grimmest Tiny House
Share This

29 September 2016

The tiny home wave is here to stay.

At this point, it's less a trend, more a counterbalance to the always-bigger-more! phenomenon that dominated the pre-global crisis housing market and continues to this day, stuffing ever-larger homes on ever-smaller lots. Tiny homes not only refute that, but also provide a housing solution for millennials, reputed to value experiences over possessions — and what is a bigger possession than an actual house?

In many regards, tiny homes are a positive force, presenting valuable questions about when enough is enough from a housing perspective; are we really so much happier with thousands of square feet versus hundreds? Signs point to no. 

All that said:

At a certain point, tiny home living can get a little grim. 

Take, for example, this shipping container, which seems to ask the question of why we ever thought living in a shipping container would be a good idea. It's got 320 square feet of living. It's insulated. It has two bedrooms, at opposite ends of its 40-foot space, with "optional extras includ[ing] an oven, dishwasher, wood burning stove, a solar panel setup, generator, and a game cleaning station," according to New Atlas

It's $50,000. It can be run off the grid. All you need is a piece of land, and you've got a place to live. That's not nothing. 

It's also the housing equivalent of a prison jumpsuit. 

We see the utility. But at a certain point, when we reduce things to the bare minimum, we opt out of something special. Like a proper home. With a porch. 

Experiences are valuable. And temperance — in our homes as well as other things — is a virtue.

But some possessions are worth the mortgage. 

Share This