Forever Chemicals Lead to Olympic Disqualifications

Fluoride wax is a no go in 2026

Skis on a snowy landscape

Who knew ski wax could be so controversial?

By Tobias Carroll

There are plenty of reasons why an Olympic athlete might find themselves disqualified from a given event. One obvious reason? Performance-enhancing drugs come to mind, though there will soon be a non-Olympic alternative for some athletes to take part in. But there’s also the matter of making sure one’s equipment is up to snuff — and, beginning with this year’s Winter Olympics, that means not having any PFAS, or “forever chemicals,” in the mix.

What happens if a competitor does turn out to have such chemicals in their equipment? They’ll find themselves disqualified. As GearJunkie’s Mary Andino reports, three skiiers have been disqualified so far due to their use of fluorocarbon wax, also known as “fluoro wax.” As Sean Higgins at Ski Racing Media explained, this kind of wax has generally been used “for that extra bit of speed on race day for decades.”

That is no longer the case, however — at least not in skiing competitions where governing bodies have sought to crack down on the use of forever chemicals. The Olympics fall into that category, and it’s led engineers to seek new ways to replicate the effects of PFAS-heavy products in a way that does not violate the new guidelines.

The Best Winter Olympics Uniforms of All Time
The greatest athletes in the world warrant get-ups of Olympic proportions. Here are the most memorable outfits to ever grace the Winter Games.

Two of the three athletes who were disqualified were cross-country skiiers representing South Korea: Han Dasom and Lee Eui-jin. The third was Japanese snowboarder Shiba Masaki. At least one of those nations was not happy with those findings and pledged to appeal the ruling. “The Ski Association has purchased fluoride-free wax products, so it will protest,” a spokesperson for the Korean Olympic Committee told Grist in response to the disqualification.

Exit mobile version